Relationships of business strategies and organizational characteristics with innovation types: Application in service companies

Relación entre estrategias de negocios y características organizacionales con los tipos de innovación: aplicación en empresas de servicios

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Resumen

Varios autores sostienen que las prácticas de innovación dependen de las estrategias de negocio. Por consiguiente, las empresas deben configurar una estructura organizacional que facilite la coordinación de tareas y permita alcanzar los objetivos. En una muestra de 203 empresas de servicio se realizó un análisis de la influencia de las estrategias de negocio y de las características organizacionales en la innovación técnica y la innovación administrativa. Los resultados indican la existencia de una relación importante entre la estrategia de negocio y las innovaciones técnicas y administrativas. Además se encontró que las características organizacionales solo mostraron una relación significativa con la innovación técnica, pero no así con la innovación administrativa.

Palabras clave

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Referencias

Aragón-Correa, J. (1998). Strategic proactivity and firm approach to the natural environment Academy of Management Journal, 41(5), 556-567.https://doi.org/10.5465/256942

Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G. and Mol, M. (2008). Management Innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 825-845.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.34421969

Blumentritt, T. and Danis, W. (2006). Business strategy types and innovative practices. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(2), 274-291.

Borch, O., Huse, M. and Senneseth, K. (1999). Resource configuration, competitive strategies, and corporate entrepreneurship an empirical examination of small firms. Entrepreneurshiphttps://doi.org/10.1177/104225879902400104

Theory and Practice, 24(1), 49-70.

Bozkurt, O. and Kalkan, A. (2014). Business strategies of SME's innovation types and factors influencing their innovation: Burdur model. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 14(2), 189-198.https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.2014218050

Bravo, E. and Ostos, J. (2017). Performance in computer-mediated work: the moderating role of level of automation. Cognition Technology and Work, 19(2-3), 529-541.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-017-0429-z

Castro, L. and Higgs, M. (2008). How the alignment of business strategy and HR strategy can impact performance. Journal of General Management, 33(4), 13-33.https://doi.org/10.1177/030630700803300402

Crossan, M. and Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: a systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154-1191https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x

Daft, R. (2008). Organization Theory and Design. Massachusetts, USA: Cengage Learning.

Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational complexity and innovation: Developing and testing multiple contingency models. Management Science, 42(5), 693-716.https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.5.693

Damanpour, F. and Aravind, D. (2011). Managerial innovation: conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Management and Organization Review, 8(2), 423-454.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00233.x

Damanpour, F. and Evan, W. (1984). Organizational Innovation and Performance: The Problem of "Organizational Lag". Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392-409.https://doi.org/10.2307/2393031

Damanpour, F., Walker, R. and Avellaneda, C. (2009). Combinative Effects of Innovation Types and Organizational Performance: A Longitudinal Study of Service Organizations. Journal ofhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00814.x

Management Studies, 46, 650-675.

Desarbo, W. et al. (2004). Revisiting the Miles and Snow strategic framework: Uncovering interrelationships between strategic types, capabilities, environmental uncertainty, and firmhttps://doi.org/10.1002/smj.431

performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 47-74.

Fiss, P. (2011). Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393-420.https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263120

Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104

Fredrickson, J. (1986). The strategic decision process and organizational structure. Academic of Management Review, 11(2), 280-297.https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4283101

Gefen, D., Straub, D. and Boudreau, M.- C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 1-76.https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407

Gunday, G. et al. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133, 662-676.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.014

Hair, J. et al. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. London, United Kingdom: Pearson, Prentice Hall.

Hambrick, D. (2003). On the staying power of defender, analyzers, and prospectors. Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), 115-118.https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2003.11851883

Hékis, H. et al. (2013). Evaluation of organizational behavior - An application of the typology of Miles and Snow in the hotel sector Florianópolis - Santa Catarina - Brazil. Revista de Globalización, Competitividad & Gobernabilidad, 7(2), 26-43.

Jansen, J., Van Den Bosch, F. and Volberda, H. (2006). Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmentalhttps://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576

Moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674.

Kabanoff, B. and Brown, S. (2008). Knowledge structures of prospectors, analyzers, and defenders: content, structure, stability, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 149-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.644

Meeus, M. and Edquist, C. (2006). Introduction to Part I: Product and process innovation. In Hage, J. and Meeus, M. (Ed.), Innovation, Science and Institutional Change. A Research Handbook (pp.23-37). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

Miles, R. and Snow, C. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.

Miles, R. and Snow, C. (2003). Organizational strategy, structure, and process. California, USA: Stanford Business Classics.

Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Nowak, R. (2017). Demystifying absorptive capacity: Focus on firm size and employee empowerment. International Journal of Innovation Management, 21(06), 1-19.https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919617500505

Olmedo-Cifuentes, I. and Martinez-León, I. (2014). Influence of management style on employee views of corporate reputation. Application to audit firms. Business Research Quarterly, 17, 223-241.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2013.08.001

Olson, E., Slater, S. and Hult, T. (2005). The performance implications of fit among business strategy, marketing organization structure, and strategic behavior. Journal of Marketing, 69(7), 49-65.https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.69.3.49.66362

Citado por